Item10164: NOAUTOLINK also disables the author name in the topic's REVINFO and in WebChanges
Priority: Normal
Current State: Closed
Released In: 1.1.3
Target Release: patch
Applies To: Engine
Component:
Branches:
In a web with NOAUTOLINK set to something else than "", the last topic editor in the upper-right corner won't be autolinked. Also in
WebChanges, authors aren't autolinked.
Fixes for this would be, in order from core to templates:
- patch
Foswiki::Render::renderRevisionInfo()
- that would take care of the author in the view template, and of the author in WebChanges. The downside would be some case in which we wouldn't want to hyperlink the username
- patch
Foswiki::Search::searchWeb()
(search for %AUTHOR%
) and view.pattern.tmpl
(search for %TMPL:DEF{"breadcrumb:annotation"}%
)
- patch PatternSkin's
search.pattern.tmpl
, searchbookview.pattern.tmpl
, and view.pattern.tmpl
It's been said in #foswiki that
ArthurClemens might have useful input.
--
DanDascalescu - 16 Dec 2010
We need to fix the search.pattern to use
[[bracketed links]]
, the more tricky question is do we apply the same fix in the default format string of
Foswiki::Render::renderRevisionInfo()
, or just do it in
view.pattern.tmpl
I think any perl code that assumes NOAUTOLINK is off is asking for trouble, but I don't have a strong opinion.
--
PaulHarvey - 16 Dec 2010
I have made the changes to the templates. I don't think changes to core code is needed.
--
ArthurClemens - 18 Dec 2010
Kenneth wrote by mail:
You cannot use the [[][]] format in any of the search results, breadcrumbs.
It is not given that all login name are on a Foswiki where
TopicUserMapping maps a login name to a wikiname.
When you use simple LDAP auth people login with a corporate ID which is
authenticated outside Foswiki.
And unless they are registered their login is not mapped to an existing
WikiName.
You change means that all topics edited by a non registered person are
presented with the author linked to a none existing topic with all the
none-existing topic features (the ?-mark that invites to creating the
new topic).
And it will not take long before the Main web is full of unwanted topics
of login names.
These problems can be avoided if first a check is done if the topic exists. Such a call is fast, even 10.000 calls in a topic is barely noticable.
--
ArthurClemens - 18 Dec 2010
Nice fix, but the issue here is you forgot to update the unit tests, and one is failing. I've fixed it for you
I took the liberty to test both cases in the unit test
Fn_SEARCH::test_no_format_no_shit
, so the first test will run without the
WikiGuest user, while the following ones (there are like 5 or more searches in this test, will have the user, so both use-cases are covered.
--
OlivierRaginel - 09 Jan 2011