21.+22- Nov 2009
Hannover
First Day
09:00 - Welcome
09:15 - General Assembly Part 1
13:00 - Break / Lunch
14:00 - General Assembly Part 2
18:00 - End of the official part
19:00 - Social Event
Second Day
09:00 - Open Space
12:00 - Break / Lunch
13:00 - Open Space
17:00 - Closing
Links
Participants
- Ingo Wolf
- Andre Lichtstein
- Eugen Mayer
- Arthur Clemens
- Sven Reher
- Crawfrod Currie
- Koen Martens
- Thomas P. Haeck
- Ingo Kappla
- Shawn Beasley
- Carlo Schulz
- Oliver Krüger
- Jens Hansen
- Michael Daum
- Kenneth Lavrsen
- Markus Überall
- Andre Ulrich
- Nynke Fokma
- Martin Seibert (10:50)
Remote participants:
- MTempest
- pharvey
- Lynnwood Brown
- Colas Nahboo
- Coria Xu
- Martin Rowe
- Sven Dowideit - part of the time
General Assembly Part 1
- Discussion about papers, making clear everybody understands the key points
- Quorums
- When do members drop down from "active" state
- collecting list of initial members: remote people needed - those present added to list passed around
- remote participants enter the foswiki-summit irc channel
- quorum reached
Initial seeding of members
Accepted members:
- AndreLichtsteiner
- AntonioTerceiro
- ArthurClemens
- CarloSchulz
- ColasNahaboo
- CoriaXu
- CrawfordCurrie
- DrakeDiedrich
- EugenMayer
- FranzJosefGigler
- GeorgeClark
- GuruprasadIyer
- IngoWolf
- KennethLavrsen
- KoenMartens
- LarsEik
- LynnwoodBrown
- MartinRowe
- MartinSeibert
- MichaelDaum
- MichaelTempest
- Nynke Fokma
- OlivierRaginel
- PadraigLennon
- PaulHarvey
- RaulFRodriguez
- RafaelAlvarez
- RaymondLutz
- ReinhardWeh
- RuiProcopio
- StephaneLenclud
- SvenDowideit
- Shawn Beasley
- ThomasPHaeck
- WillNorris
- Sue Blake (unixhag on irc)
Since this is the list from the protocol the extra topic
CurrentFoswikiMembers has been created.
Unknown:
not associated to current members currently,
- DonWennick
- StefanPalm
- MartyBrandon
- JustinMeadows
- NathanDye
- Discussion: how often are new members accepted:
- Jens made a good point: no hurry to accept new members, you can still participate
- Nynke: underlines importance of protection
- Kenneth: concerned about time it needs to be approved
- Conclusion: new members are approved at the beginning of a GA and then can vote for the rest of the process
- The size of the association is another factor that protects it
- Kenneth: voting rules might be changed later not to be taken over by 50 hard working/committed ibm committers
- Jens: accepting members is an honor. it remains a soft decision
- Michael: can be add a deadline before GAs for membership requests? on button pressed on next GA - informal process, ACTION: enhace user form on foswiki.org to capture two supporters
- Crawford: ACTION - enhance association page to describe why to be come a member DONE
Vote on new members: 6 votes (einstimmig)
Election of board
All 5 members of the former board stepped back.
3 for 2 years, 2 for 1 year
Nominees |
Votes |
Term |
Crawford Currie |
26 |
2y |
Kenneth Lavrsen |
18 |
2y |
Oliver Krüger |
18 |
2y |
Sven Dowideit |
18 |
1y |
Michael Daum |
17 |
1y |
Arthur Clemens |
14 |
|
Ingo Kappler |
8 |
|
Koen Martens |
14 |
|
- Stepped back:
- Andre Ulrich
- Ingo Kappler
- Jens Hansen
- Markus Überall
- Oliver Krüger
Vote Counters:
- Andre Lichsteiner
- Markus Überall
Vote on destroying the online material:
Agenda for the first board meeting is at
FoswikiBoardMeetings
Election of two auditors
Term 1 year
- clarification of the role of an auditor
Candidates:
- Koen Martens
- Ingo Kappler
Accepted by vote concordantly by all participants
Bylaws
http://foswiki.org/Community/ByLaws
- discussion and clarification
- key point: "on behalf of the foswiki community" does not cover personal utterances on mailing list or irc.
- examples: release notes, press release kind of official notes
- release notes can be sent out without the board having to check
- at the moment the proposed bylaws don't seem to be clear enuf. discussion is ongoing.
vote: "who agrees with it" 0 votes for, 3 undecided, rest against
- rejected right now
- decision: board will come up with a proposal and we will have an online vote later
Statements on behalf of employers
- stating the obvious
- wording not clear
vote: 3 undecided, 0 votes pro, rest against
Advertising for goods and services
- discussion if this is over-regulating everyday business that works out quite fine without this bylaw
- distinguishing socially accepted behavior versus explicit laws
vote: 4 pro, 8 against, 7 undecided
- precondition is the previous proposal
- does not make sense on its own
vote: 0 pro, 3 undecided, rest against
Privacy policy
http://foswiki.org/Community/PrivacyPolicy
- impring (Impressum) legally required (i.e. in Germany)
- an address has to be added, i.e. the location of the Foswiki Association e.V. address
- question to vote on: do we need the privacy policy as part of the bylaws
vote: 0 pro, 2 undecided, rest against
- the board will make sure that there is a privacy policy
Vote on forwarded motions
Use Of Domains
- http://foswiki.org/Community/UseOfDomainsMotion
- the given domains need to be protected. foswiki.de owned by Sven Reher, will be added to the list, maybe two or three more
- domains should be owned by the Foswiki Association long term, right now they are held privately
- question: should the Foswiki Association handed over the domains:
- foswiki.org
- foswiki.com
- foswiki.net
- foswiki.de
- foswiki.cn
vote: 0 against, 1 undecided, rest pro
- ACTION for board: There has to be a formal handover.
Trademark
- Foswiki registered trademark in US
- decision: the board will contact Lynnwood
- no vote needed during the GA
Association Membership Fee
http://foswiki.org/Community/AssociationMembershipFeeMotion
- Proposed annual fees, decided for one year
not decided: 1
- decision: 10 EUR annual fee per member, decision reviewed next year
Proposal for task force reporting
http://foswiki.org/Community/TaskForceReportingProposal
- have to decide on the task team process in the first place
- is it overregulated
vote: 1 undecided, rest against
- decision: rejected proposal
Planning And Ops Forum
http://foswiki.org/Community/PlanningAndOpsForumProposal
- ongoing discussion
- needs a revisit of the task team process
- this issue is not to be decided here, it needs a "task team" to explore it
- idea good, details not clear
vote: 0 pro, rest against, 5 undecided
- decision: rejected proposal
Off-track ideas
- where does the money for domains etc come from?
- is there a Three-Letters-Acronym-Company program sponsoring open source projects with an association - ACTION: Colas
IRC log
- foswiki-summit.log: IRC log from #foswiki-summit during the Hannover summit, timestamps in UTC